radiometric dating how radiometric dating works in general why methods in general are inaccurate why kar dating is inaccurate the branching ratio problem.
Figure 2 how relative dating of events and radiometric numeric dates are combined to produce a calibrated geological time scale in this example the data demonstrates that fossil b time was somewhere between 151 and 140 million years ago and that fossil a time is older than 151 million years ago.
Common creationist criticisms of mainstream dating methods by chris stassen part of stassens faq file the age of the earth which also deals with many other youngearth assertions besides radiometric dating radiometric dating and the geological time scale circular reasoning or reliable tools.
radiometric dating he question of the ages of the earth and its rock formations and features has fascinated philosophers theologians and scientists for centuries primarily because the answers put our lives in temporal perspective.
All of these methods are accurate only back to the last global catastrophe ie the global flood of 2348 bc as global catastrophes reset all the radiometricatomic clocks by invalidating the evolutionists main dating assumption that there have never been any global catastrophesthe assumptions are similar to the assumptions used in carbon dating.
Our understanding of the shape and pattern of the history of life depends on the accuracy of fossils and dating methods some critics particularly religious fundamentalists argue that neither fossils nor dating can be trusted.
the age of the earth strengths and weaknesses of radiometric and other dating methods see also the discussions on dating a young earth and biblical earth dating.
radiocarbon dating also referred to as carbon dating or carbon14 dating is a method for determining the age of an object containing organic material by using the properties of radiocarbon a radioactive isotope of carbon the method was developed in the late 1940s by willard libby who received the nobel prize in chemistry for his work in 1960 it is.
Before more precise absolute dating tools were possible researchers used a variety of comparative approaches called relative dating these methods some of which are still used today provide only an approximate spot within a previously established sequence think of it as ordering rather than dating.